Below is a summary of comments published in The Southwark News, March 2026.
The Council has drawn up a scheme to change the traffic flows around Peckham Rye intended to improve cycling and bus services.
Local residents’ concerns don’t seem to have had much impact. The closure of Peckham Rye East to through traffic will force it all along Peckham Rye West, and the moving of bus stops to a narrow part of the road will lead to bunching, congestion and increased danger to cyclists. Peckham Rye east is less busy but an essential relief for through traffic, a quiet cycle route even now. But cyclists soon have to feed into other traffic, so what's the point of closing this short stretch?
On the West side there's no provision at all - cyclists trying to pass buses bunched at the new stop in the narrowest part of the road will put them in conflict with oncoming traffic. Already an accident spot, this proposal is fraught with danger. At present traffic can pass buses stopped at the junction but with it all thrown on this side it will lead to much more congestion at peak time. The so-called 'bus gate' will be a cash cow for the Council with drivers straying through - mostly inadvertently - at night or in reduced visibility. Penalising law-abiding people fosters resentment and feelings of injustice.
This scheme should stand or fall on its impact on road accidents, where the Council offers us not a shred of data. But it's clear from what's published by the Government that most accidents are on Peckham Rye West - where the Council wants all the traffic to go. Without that, how can they tell whether the scheme is good value for money or not?
The Council says the impact on bus services will be marginal, but it's clear the busiest northbound buses - 12,63, 363,197 - will all be affected. The present scheme was designed to speed buses through the junction with East Dulwich Road by limiting right turns - bringing it back means more congestion, taking longer to get through the junction. While the new bus lanes might help, they're now 24 hours rather than peak time only as originally proposed. This could badly affect local businesses.
It's also inconvenient for bus passengers, as moving the southbound stop from the junction makes the east-west interchange with other buses much longer, with a bigger gap to the next stop.
In the first scheme the Council proposed a 'floating bus stop' at Nigel Road. Faced with criticism they've moved it up Rye Lane. At present buses can easily overtake each other at Nigel Road, but in a narrower part of the road this will be more restricted, conflicting not only with buses coming the other way but also cyclists. At the Nigel Road junction itself the slip road is to be paved over, reducing the capacity of the junction. At peak times traffic will back up along Nigel Road, likely to mean motorists taking more risks.
We have extreme concerns that the already congested and polluted junction of Peckham Rye west and East Dulwich Road used by students from The Harris Academy schools will be affected by the increase of vehicular traffic on the junction. The young children’s nursery adjacent to the crossroads will be directly affected by the increase of traffic and is not acceptable.
This is a hugely expensive and disruptive scheme which offers very little for local residents. The Council is not even spending its own money, it's funded by TfL. Coming after months of congestion by road works for gas renewals, it's yet another burden for people and businesses, risking more injuries for cyclists, not less. The present arrangements took years to evolve, well understood with very few accidents. This scheme is poor value for money and should be abandoned.